Gevertz v. Gevertz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring a court to consider the number of hours that should reasonably have been expended in particular case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Whitehurst v. Camp
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-09-04· cited 17×
• Whitehurst v. Camp
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-08-14· cited 9×
• Donald S. Zuckerman, Pa v. Alex Hofrichter, Pa
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-26· cited 6×
• GH Johnson Const. Co. v. APG Elec., Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-14· cited 5×
• Shidara Investments Co., N.V. v. Republic National Bank of Miami
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-15

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Estate of Platt
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-10-03· cited 40×
• Miller v. First American Bank and Trust
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-11-02· cited 10×
• Gevertz v. Gevertz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-08-07· cited 6×
• Carey v. Carey Investment Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-06-25· cited 1×