Getty v. Sturm-Ruger and Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• action not separable where plaintiff had but a single wrong, even though separate legal theories were advanced against separate defendants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Crier v. Zimmer, Inc.
  E.D. Louisiana· 1983-06-22· cited 6×
• Blue Ox Corp. v. Murphy Oil Corp.
  D. Montana· 1981-10-02· cited 3×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Finn
  Supreme Court· 1951-04-09· cited 1,278×
• Pullman Co. v. Jenkins
  Supreme Court· 1939-01-16· cited 698×
• Hebel v. Hebel Ex Rel. Hebel
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1967-12-08· cited 141×
• Clarence E. Morris, Inc. v. Vitek
  Ninth Circuit· 1969-06-17· cited 96×
• Union Planters National Bank of Memphis v. Cbs, Inc., Stax Records, Inc., Alvertis Isbell, A/K/A Al Bell, and James F. Stewart
  Sixth Circuit· 1977-06-21· cited 43×
• Tommy Gene Sessions, Administrator of the Estate of Kenneth E. Sessions v. Chrysler Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1975-06-03· cited 34×
• Drickersen v. Drickersen
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1976-01-08· cited 32×
• Climax Chemical Co. v. C. F. Braun & Co.
  Tenth Circuit· 1966-12-29· cited 23×
• Bowerman v. Tomhave
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1975-12-23· cited 7×