Geter v. Horning Bros. Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that witness’s many years of investigating maritime accidents qualified him to opine that defendants’ actions had caused an electrical fire on a vessel, despite his lack of “experience or training in electrical matters”
• “mandate to take evidence besides objective medical findings into account has been solidly established in the case law of this and other circuits”
• “mandate to take evidence besides objective medical findings into account has been solidly established in the case law of this and other circuits”
• “resolution of conflicts in the evidence or questions of credibility is outside the court’s purview, and thus where the record supports more than one outcome, the ALJ’s view prevails”
• “resolution of conflicts in the evidence or questions of credibility is outside the court’s purview, and thus where the record supports more than one outcome, the ALJ’s view prevails”
• “resolution of conflicts in the evidence or 4 questions of credibility is outside the court’s purview, and thus where the record supports more than one outcome, the ALJ’s view prevails”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).