· 6/26/2000
Gessman v. United States (In Re Applied Paging Technologies, Inc.)
Citations
- 250 B.R. 496
- 44 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 774
- 86 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5490
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10125
- 2000 WL 974925
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A] mere difference [of] opinion regarding the resolution of a factual issue will not permit reversal under the clearly erroneous standard.”
- “[A] mere difference [of] opinion regarding the resolution of a factual issue will not permit reversal under the clearly erroneous standard.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wolin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.