Skip to main content
· 2/5/1912

Gessler v. Graham

Citations

  • 234 Pa. 586
  • 83 A. 429
  • 1912 Pa. LEXIS 691

Syllabus

<p>Contract — Sale—Cemetery monument — Compliance with contract — Evidence—Charge of court.</p> <p>In an action to recover the price of a monument, where the defense was that the granite used was not the kind stipulated, and that there were substantial defects in material and workmanship, the trial judge properly charges that the plaintiffs were bound to furnish the kind of granite specified, and if they did not they could not recover; and if they furnished the kind specified, but that the workmanship although not perfect, substantially complied with the contract, the plaintiff might recover the contract price less an allowance for minor defects.</p>

Judges: Brown, Elkin, Fell, Mestrezat, Moschzisker, Potter, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.