Gerzog v. London Fog Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a claim for loss of consortium is a derivative claim which does not exist separate and apart from the injured spouse’s claims”
• holding that \a claim for loss of consortium is a derivative claim which does not exist separate and apart from the injured spouse's claims\
• “[W]here the injured spouse’s underlying claims are dismissed, the claim for loss of consortium must similarly be dismissed.”’
• “In 1993, the New York Court of Appeals noted that ... every claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress that the court reviewed failed because the conduct alleged was not sufficiently outrageous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).