Skip to main content
· 11/13/1968

Gerst v. Goldsbury

Citations

  • 434 S.W.2d 665
  • 12 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 111
  • 1968 Tex. LEXIS 368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • agency determination that applicant offered \insufficient evidence of a public need for the proposed [savings] association\ constituted \negative finding\
  • agency determination that applicant offered “insufficient evidence of a public need for the proposed [savings] association” constituted “negative finding”
  • agency order must stand when substantial evidence would support either affirmative or negative findings
  • order of disapproval is correct if substantial evidence supports any of agency's negative findings
  • agency order must stand when substantial evidence would support either affirmative or negative findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steakley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.