Skip to main content
· 11/7/2000

Gershak v. Feign

Citations

  • 738 N.E.2d 600
  • 250 Ill. Dec. 384
  • 317 Ill. App. 3d 14
  • 2000 Ill. App. LEXIS 865

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the trial court erred in not allowing attorneys to cure a defective signature in their filed rejection of arbitration award
  • failure to comply with supreme court rule regarding signature by an attorney did not abrogate the rejection of the award, affirming the trial court’s determination of validity of the rejection
  • failure to comply with supreme court rule regarding signature by an attorney did not abrogate the rejection of the award, affirming the trial court's determination of validity of the rejection
  • because the purpose of Rule 137 is to punish those who file “groundless lawsuits,” a petition under the Rule “must be specific enough to enable the responding party to respond to the allegations and enable the court to make a determination on the merits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cahill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.