Gerren-Jarrod Brokenberry v. Aida Iris Victoria

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• referring to Chevron, U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842-43 (1984)
• referring to Chevron, U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842-43 (1984)
• referring to Chevron, U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842-43 (1984)
• “Where the agency has not used a deliberative process such as notice-and-comment rulemaking, . . . the court cannot presume Congress intended to grant the interpretation the force of law.”
• “RESPA is an anti-kickback statute, not an anti-price gouging statute”
• “RESPA is an anti-kickback statute, not an anti-price gouging statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).