Skip to main content
· 5/29/2001

Gernstein v. Allen

Citations

  • 630 N.W.2d 672
  • 10 Neb. Ct. App. 214
  • 2001 Neb. App. LEXIS 106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting collateral consequences argument of reputation harm because case did not involve criminal conviction, but finding appeal not moot under “capable of repetition” exception because of due process issues presented, specifically scope of required hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hannon, Carlson, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.