Germany v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In Re A.H. Robins Co.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the arbitrator did not exceed his authority in rendering conclusion as to causation, an issue properly within the arbitrator’s scope of consideration
• stating that “disagreement with an arbitrator’s factual findings does not constitute adequate grounds for vacating his decision”
• stating that “disagreement with an arbitrator’s factual findings does not constitute adequate grounds for vacating his decision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).