Germantown Trust Co. v. Powell
Citations
- 265 Pa. 71
- 108 A. 441
- 1919 Pa. LEXIS 500
Syllabus
<p>Constitutional law — Escheats—Act of June 7, 1915, P. L. 878— Impairing obligation of contract — Due process of law — Equal protection of the law — Title of act — Special legislation — Classification Corporation — Statute of limitations.</p> <p>1. The Commonwealth by virtue of its sovereign power, may take charge of property abandoned .or unclaimed for a period of time.</p> <p>2. The Act of June 1, 1915, P. L. 878, entitled “An Act providing for the escheat of deposits of money or property of another received for storage or safe keeping,” etc., does not violate Art. I, Sec. 17, of the Constitution of Pennsylvania, and Art. I, Section 10, of the Constitution of the United States, by. impairing the obligation of the contract between the owner of the property and the depositary.</p> <p>3. The agreement of the bank or depositary is to keep the money and pay it on demand. When demand is made the contractual relation ends. A statute of escheat, in effect, simply provides for a termination of the contract of deposit, at the instance of the Commonwealth and by virtue of its sovereign power where there are no heirs to claim the property after the death of the owner, or after the expiration of such reasonable time as may be fixed by law to raise a presumption of death.</p> <p>4. While the Act of 1915 requires the filing of certain reports, for the information of the Commonwealth, a considerable time before an escheat is declared, this provision is reasonable and enables the Commonwealth to follow up property as to which there is no apparent claim of ownership.</p> <p>5. The act does not deprive an owner of his property without due process of law. While the fact of death is established only presumptively by failure of the owner or any known heirs to appear, this is not in itself sufficient to constitute a denial of due process of law, or the equal protection of the law within the meaning of the provisions of the State and Federal Constitutions.</p> <p>6. The title of the Ac
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- particularly Justice Moschzisker’s concurring opinion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Frazer, Kephart, Moschzisker, Stewart, Walling
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brooklyn Borough Gas Co. v. BennettNew York County Courts· 1935-01-09· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. GlassSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-11-15· cited 7×
- Seaborn v. Reno Nat. BankD. Nevada· 1937-09-28· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. Provident Life & Trust Co.Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1922-05-05
- Commonwealth v. Girard National BankPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1922-05-05
- Lutton v. PowellBeaver County Court of Common Pleas· 1925-08-01
- Commonwealth v. SnydermanPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1939-02-15
- Commonwealth v. York Water Co.York County Court of Common Pleas· 1939-09-09
- In re Pennsylvania Indemnity Corp.Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1939-12-07
- In re Harrisburg Gas Co.Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas· 1940-03-11
- In re Harrisburg Bridge Co.Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas· 1940-03-11
- In re Philadelphia Electric Co.Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1940-06-24
- In re Pennsylvania RailroadDauphin County Court of Common Pleas· 1943-04-28
- In re Metropolitan Edison Co.Berks County Court of Common Pleas· 1944-01-04
- Commonwealth v. Woodlands Cemetery Co.Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1956-07-20
- County Commissioners v. ProthonotaryLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 1957-07-08
- Murdoch v. Pennsylvania RailroadDauphin County Court of Common Pleas· 1958-10-28
- Commonwealth v. Upper Main Line BankChester County Court of Common Pleas· 1965-07-09
- Commonwealth v. SweeneyPhiladelphia County Court of Oyer and Terminer· 1924-09-15
- Commonwealth v. BaldwinPhiladelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions· 1929-05-08
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cunnius v. Reading School DistrictSupreme Court· 1905-05-29· cited 94×
- Ayars v. WestfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1889-01-07· cited 84×
- Seabolt v. Commissioners of Northumberland CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1898-07-21· cited 76×
- Commonwealth v. PuderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1918-04-22· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. Dollar Savings BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1917-06-30· cited 42×
- Nolan v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1919-01-04· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. SellersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1889-10-28· cited 35×
- Cunnius v. Reading School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1903-07-09· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. GrossmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1915-01-11· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. MuirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1897-01-25· cited 12×
Other cases named Germantown Trust Co. v. Powell
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.