Germann v. Stephens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding business owner did not have a property interest in a liquor license she had yet to obtain
• “The explicit grant of immunity in the second sentence of § 2-9- 305(5), MCA, belies [the plaintiff's] contention that the statute serves merely as an anti-double recovery statute.”
• “[An] employee enjoys immunity from individual liability for the conduct where the county acknowledges that the conduct arose out of the course and scope of the employee’s official duties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).