Germann v. F.L. Smithe MacHine Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the foreseeable removal of a detachable-safety device did not negate manufacturer liability
• “The question of whether a legal duty to warn exists is a question of law for the court – not one for jury resolution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).