German v. Nichopoulos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a recovery for negligence requires proof of a negligent act that causes a loss
• holding expert evidence required to establish informed consent when patient knew of procedure to be performed but alleged that no risks associated with procedure were disclosed
• “[I]n matters of informed consent the plaintiff has the burden of proving by expert medical evidence, (a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).