German v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• State furlough program did not violate takings clause since no property interest in future wages for future State employment existed
• as an office created by the Legislature, CPCS may be regulated, limited, enlarged or terminated by law, as public exigency or policy may require
• statute establishing “new [lower] rate of compensation for State employees” not taking

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).