German Savings Institution v. Jacoby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that structure of a statute can be an interpretive tool
• noting that structure of a statute can be an interpretive tool
• declining to apply the last antecedent rule where such an interpretation would be counter to legislative intent, as apparent from the statutory scheme
• explaining the genesis of the Driver Privacy Act and noting its “general rule that motor vehicle ‘records shall not be public records or open to the inspection of any person’” (quoting RSA 260:14, II(a))
• explaining the genesis of the Driver Privacy Act and noting its “general rule that motor vehicle ‘records shall not be public records or open to the inspection of any person’” (quoting RSA 260:14, II(a))
• “Wages’ ... shall not include any sum paid by the employer to the employee to cover any special expenses incurred by the employee because of the nature of the employment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).