German Mutual Insuurance Co. v. Yeager

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that an intentional act exclusion to insurance coverage applies only when insured intends to cause harm, not when insured merely intends the act
• ruling that an intentional act exclusion to insurance coverage applies only when insured intends to cause harm, not when insured merely intends the act
• construing the same exclusionary clause to be unambiguous, but holding that the clause precludes coverage “only where the insured intends to cause harm, not merely where the insured generally intends the act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).