Gerken v. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• claimant “is not required [by the Act] to prove the existence of a phantom vehicle. He need only present evidence which corroborates (strengthens or confirms) his testimony of the phantom vehicle.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).