Skip to main content
· 6/2/1987

Geringer v. Union Electric Co.

Citations

  • 731 S.W.2d 859
  • 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that law firm which represented client in underlying action was in privity with client, thus law firm could assert collateral estoppel as a bar to relitigation of issue resolved in previous lawsuit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crist, Kelly, Satz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.