· 6/2/1987
Geringer v. Union Electric Co.
Citations
- 731 S.W.2d 859
- 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4157
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that law firm which represented client in underlying action was in privity with client, thus law firm could assert collateral estoppel as a bar to relitigation of issue resolved in previous lawsuit
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crist, Kelly, Satz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.