Gericke v. Begin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that safety concerns might justify a command to bystanders to disperse notwithstanding that the command might “incidentally impact an individual’s exercise of the First Amendment right to film.”
• holding \[r]easonable restrictions on the exercise of the right to film may be imposed when the circumstances justify them\
• noting that objectors who improve set‐ tlement “will receive a cash award that can be substantial”
• noting that objectors who improve set‐ tlement “will receive a cash award that can be substantial”
• noting that objectors who improve set‐ tlement “will receive a cash award that can be substantial”
• highlighting that the reasonableness of the restriction may be considered in evaluating a retaliation claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).