Gerety v. Poitras

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if a claimant has an adequate remedy at law “and the main cause of action is of a legal nature, equity has no jurisdiction.”
• “Equity will not afford relief where there is a plain, adequate, and complete remedy at law.”
• “Equity will not afford relief where there is a plain, adequate, and complete remedy at law.”
• “Equity will not afford relief where there is a plain, adequate, and complete remedy at law. And if the complainant does have such remedy, and the main cause of action is of a legal nature, equity has no jurisdiction.” (citations omitted)
• “Equity will not afford relief where there is a plain, adequate, and complete remedy at law. And if the complainant does have such remedy, and the main cause of action is of a legal nature, equity has no jurisdiction.” (citation omitted)
• “Equity will not afford relief where there is a plain, adequate, and complete remedy at law. And if the complainant does have such remedy, and the main cause of action is of a legal nature, equity has no jurisdiction.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).