Geressy v. Digital Equipment Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The purpose behind Rule 30(b)(6) is to create testimony that will bind the corporation.”
• “Rule 26(g) does not require the signing attorney to certify the truthfulness of the client's factual responses to a discovery request” and holding that “Rule 26(g
• “Rule 26(g) does not require the signing attorney to certify the truthfulness of the client's factual responses to a discovery request” and holding that “Rule 26(g
• “For example, if State Farm seeks to contradict its Rule 30(b)(6
• “Rule 26(g) does not require the signing attorney to certify the truthfulness of the client's factual responses to a discovery request” and holding that “Rule 26(g) only governs certification and cannot be the basis for sanctioning an allegedly improper verification.”
• “[T]he mere fact that counsel [] may have provided such information to the witness in preparation for the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition does not convert the information into attorney work product. . . . [Otherwise,] anytime an attorney is involved in preparing a Rule 30(b)(6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).