Gerdau Ameristeel U.S. Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that it was the province of the jury to weigh a witness's credibility, even where the witness was a paid informant
• discussing the principle that possession of quantities greater than user quantities indicates intent to distribute
• upholding convictions based on testimony of a paid informant who had been granted immunity from prosecution
• listing factors which lead to reasonable inference of intent to distribute
• It is the role of the jury, which is aware of the possible motivations behind accomplice testimony, to weigh issues of credibility
• possession of 4.1 grams of methamphetamine, without more, is insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).