Gerber v. P & L Finance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concerning uniformed services and its appli‐ cation to retired dual‐status military technicians who are also federal ci‐ vilian employees
• concerning uniformed services and its appli‐ cation to retired dual‐status military technicians who are also federal ci‐ vilian employees
• collecting cases about inactive military duty not included in employment definition under § 410(l)(1)(B)
• collecting cases about inactive military duty not included in employment definition under § 410(l)(1)(B)
• requiring the 16 court to “independently examine the text and context of the statute” to 17 determine if the agency’s interpretation is inconsistent with the 18 wording of the regulations or the statute under which the regulations 19 were promulgated
• “[P]olicy statements, agency manuals, and enforcement guidelines do not carry 7 the force of law and are not entitled to Chevron deference.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).