Gerber v. Iyengar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that by offering an expert's testimony regarding the expert's conversation with an author of a treatise, the defendant sought to use the expert's testimony to introduce inadmissible hearsay
• concluding that the result of allowing the expert's testimony to act as a conduit for inadmissible hearsay is that the \highly impeachable statement . . . was presented for the jury's consumption without affording . . . an opportunity to cross-examine\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).