Gerbaz v. Hulsey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that time was not of the essence where the contract did not so state and the conduct of the parties was clear
• “[T]he[] defendant was in a position to elect[] when he discovered the fact[.]” (emphasis added)
• a party cannot affirm a contract in part and disaffirm it in part
• “Tender is not required where it would be an idle or useless thing.”
• \Tender is not required where it would be an idle or useless thing.\
• tender is not required where it would be idle or useless thing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).