Gerard Cardenas v. Jon Massey James Rebo Robert Lipscher James Ciancia Deborah Poritz State of New Jersey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs claim survived summary judgment because a jury could determine that a hostile work environment existed based upon discriminatory comments and facially neutral mistreatment
• holding that Evans is inapposite where plaintiff alleges ongoing discriminatory conduct within the statute of limitations
• holding that a rational factfinder could find a hostile work environment where, over the course of about three years, the plaintiff, a Hispanic man: (1
• holding that each of a series of discriminatory paychecks was a distinct violation of plaintiffs right to nondiscriminatory compensation, even though the disparate pay stemmed from a prelimitations period pay-grade classification
• explaining that an adverse employment action is one which is serious and tangible enough to. alter an employee’s compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment
• finding that summary judgment based on the affirmative defense would be premature because there were factual issues outstanding as to the reasonableness of the parties’ actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).