Geraldine McCULLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. H.B. FULLER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding witness was not qualified to opine on the adequacy of the warnings of a specialized glue because he lacked expertise in either the product — was not a chemical engineer, toxicologist or an environmental engineer — or the design of warning labels
• affirming district court’s ruling that plaintiff’s proffered expert did not possess the required qualifications to testify as an expert on the subject of warning labels for hot melt glue
• affirming district court’s ruling that plaintiff's proffered expert did not possess the required qualifications to testify as an expert on the subject of warning labels for hot melt glue
• affirming district court's ruling that plaintiff's proffered expert did not possess the required qualifications to testify as an expert on the subject of warning labels for hot melt glue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).