Gerald W. Kerr v. Charles F. Vatterott & Co. Commerce Bank of St. Louis, N. A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an appeal as to whether lost interest is an equitable remedy involved primarily issues of law
• noting that monetary relief had been included \as a corollary to the injunction\ only
• noting that monetary relief had been included “as a corollary to the injunction” only
• “[T]he wrongdoer should not be allowed to use the withheld benefits or retain interest earned on the funds during the time of the dispute.”
• \[T]he wrongdoer should not be allowed to use the withheld benefits or retain interest earned on the funds during the time of the dispute.\
• \Prejudgment interest awards are permitted under ERISA where necessary to afford the plaintiff 'other appropriate equitable relief' under section 1132(a)(3)(B).\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).