Gerald v. University of Puerto Rico

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a single incident of physical sexual assault was sufficiently egregious on its own to demonstrate a claim for hostile work environment
• holding that de minimis procedural defects can be 22 cured even after the expiration of the removal period
• holding that a single incident of physical sexual assault was sufficiently egregious on its own to demonstrate a claim for hostile work environment
• stating that element requiring severe or pervasive harassment affecting work performance did not warrant summary judgment against plaintiff “especially given the evidence we have as to the other considerations”
• highlighting that just three acts of harassment during an employee’s six years working with her supervisor may, if egregious enough, be sufficient to prove a hostile work environment existed
• affirming dismissal of first amended complaint and finding leave 17 to amend futile where complaint’s allegations belied plaintiff’s entitlement to relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).