Gerald T. Smith v. National Health Care Services of Peoria, Appeal of J. Brian Heller, Attorney For

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• involving case where plaintiff added a \Preserved Claims\ section to his amended pleading
• involving case where plaintiff added a “Preserved Claims” section to his amended pleading
• denying a motion for Rule 11 sanctions where the party made good faith arguments for the modification of existing law and holding that “[t]he argument ... need not be convincing or likely to succeed” if it is made in good faith
• “This court in Bastían stated that dismissed claims need not be included in an amended complaint, because the final judgment brings up all previous rulings in the case”
• “In order to determine whether the complaint is an effort to change law rather than a refusal to acknowledge adverse precedent, a court must examine later arguments by counsel in support of the complaint”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).