Gerald Schafer v. Board Of Public Education Of The School District Of Pittsburgh, Pa.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the plaintiff’s employer and labor union did not share a commonality of interests despite being party to the same collective bargaining agreement
• explaining that Glus applies only where the unnamed party “has notice and when there is a commonality of interest between the unnamed party and the named party”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).