Gerald Pizzuto, Jr. v. Al Ramirez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Ninth Circuit has “not allowed petitioners to substantially 4 expand the scope of Martinez beyond the circumstances present in Martinez”
• explaining that the Ninth Circuit 16 has “not allowed petitioners to substantially expand the scope of Martinez beyond the 17 circumstances present in Martinez”
• explaining that the Ninth Circuit has “not allowed petitioners to substantially 13 expand the scope of Martinez beyond the circumstances present in Martinez”
• requiring more specific evidence of fraud than plaintiffs “series of allegations and implications”
• finding Rule 60(b) motion proper in habeas 7 context where petitioner argued that certain claims were “improperly held procedurally 8 defaulted” and “that the state’s lawyers perpetrated a fraud on the federal district court”
• stating standard of review and requirements to show fraud under Rule 60

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).