Gerald P. Pecoraro v. The Diocese of Rapid City, a South Dakota Nonprofit Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding under South Dakota law that, failure to take heed of numerous warnings regarding personal jurisdiction was unreasonable”
• “Courts generally require strict compliance with a statute of limitations and rarely invoke doctrines such as equitable tolling to alleviate a plaintiff from a loss of his right to assert a claim.”
• “Courts generally require strict compliance with a statute of limitations and rarely invoke doctrines such as equitable tolling to alleviate a plaintiff from a loss of his right to assert a claim.”
• interpreting South Dakota law and articulating the same standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).