Gerald Metals, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that factors as a whole must indicate that LTFV imports themselves made a material contribution to the injury
• affirming a remand determination that was limited to Ukraine even though ITC continued to cumulate imports from Ukraine, Russia, and China
• declining to stay proceedings pending an appeal on the same issue in a different case because the court cannot speculate as to what might happen on appeal
• discussing how an ITC Commissioner could not find “clear evidence of a cost-price squeeze, [and thus] conclude[d] that price suppression could not be attributed to the LTFV imports to a significant degree”
• discussing Federal Circuit’s decision in Gerald Metals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).