Gerald Krafsur v. Michael Davenport

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that this result would “overturn a central element of the Act’s architecture”
• requiring a constitutional challenge to a prohibited personnel practice be exhausted under the CSRA despite the risk of the Special Counsel refusing to petition the MSPB
• “A court may not review the Special Counsel's decisions unless the Counsel has declined to investigate a complaint at all.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[I]f the Special Counsel . . . declines to refer the case to the Board, the employee is out of luck. A court may not review the Special Counsel’s decisions unless the Counsel has declined to investigate a complaint at all.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).