· 7/21/1999
Gerald Hickman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Citations
- 183 F.3d 535
- 84 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5346
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 16726
- 1999 WL 511924
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a district court’s discretionary determination of the amount of restitution a criminal tax-evasion defendant had to pay was unnecessary to the judgment and thus could not be given preclusive effect
- holding that a district court’s discretionary determination of the amount of restitution a criminal tax-evasion defendant had to pay was unnecessary to the judgment and thus could not be given preclusive effect
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Engel, Nelson, Norris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.