Skip to main content
· 7/21/1999

Gerald Hickman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Citations

  • 183 F.3d 535
  • 84 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5346
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 16726
  • 1999 WL 511924

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a district court’s discretionary determination of the amount of restitution a criminal tax-evasion defendant had to pay was unnecessary to the judgment and thus could not be given preclusive effect
  • holding that a district court’s discretionary determination of the amount of restitution a criminal tax-evasion defendant had to pay was unnecessary to the judgment and thus could not be given preclusive effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Engel, Nelson, Norris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.