Gerald Geier v. Missouri Ethics Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the district court’s determination that Younger abstention, which the district court raised sua sponte, was warranted
• affirming the district court’s determination that Younger abstention, which the district court raised sua sponte, was warranted
• “Granting .. . a motion for leave to amend is inappropriate . . . ifthe district court has indicated . . . that no amendment is possible ....” (cleaned up and citation omitted)
• affirming dismissal where the district court abstained sua sponte under the Younger doctrine
• affirming dismissal where the district court abstained sua sponte under the Younger doctrine
• finding amendment futile where court had already considered argument in dispositive motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).