GERALD G. SALITROS, — v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, —

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that there was sufficient evidence that the plaintiff engaged in protected activity and was retaliated against in the employment context such that a jury award of damages was proper
• stating that front pay is a disfavored remedy
• “Our Circuit long ago rejected the notion that compensatory damages, as opposed to nominal damages, were prerequisite to an award of punitives.”
• “In fashioning equitable relief, the district court may take into account facts that were not determined by the jury, but it may not base its decision on factual findings that conflict with the jury’s findings.”
• “A vacated decision is deprived of its precedential effect.”
• stating standard of review is abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).