Gerald C. Woythal v. Tex-Tenn Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that employer’s questions about employee’s retirement “do not amount to evidence” that age was motivation for termination
• concluding that employer’s questions about employee’s retirement “do not amount to evidence” that age was motivation for termination
• stating that, where an employee had generated many of the rumors regarding his pending employment, an employer was \entitled to inquire . . . whether the rumors were true\
• noting that questions about a plaintiff’s retirement “do not amount 1 Plaintiff cites to the case McGray v. Pee Dee Reg’l Transp. Auth., 263 F. App’x 301 (4th Cir. 2008
• distinguishing questions that amounted to pressure or suggestions to retire from mere inquiries
• finding an employer’s questions regarding an employee’s retirement plans were reasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).