Gerald Banks and Kelly Banks v. Unisys Corporation and Burroughs Corporation,defendants-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing the district court’s grant of summary judgment on the existence of an implied-in-fact contract because the plaintiff’s conduct in refusing to sign over his inventive rights to his employer was evidence that there was “no meeting of the minds”
• “The well-pleaded complaint . . . requested that the district court correct [inventorship] under 35 U.S.C. §§ 116 and 256. Therefore, we have jurisdiction because the district court’s jurisdiction was based, in part, on 28 U.S.C. § 1338.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).