Gerace v. Cleveland Clinic Found.
Citations
- 248 N.E.3d 872
- 2024 Ohio 2708
Syllabus
Civ.R. 56 summary judgment tortious interference attorney-client privilege work-product common-interest doctrine. The trial court did not err in granting appellees' motion for summary judgment when there was no genuine issue of material fact that appellees did not tortiously interfere in appellant's relationship with his previous employer. The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion to compel because the discovery in question was covered by the work-product and common-interest doctrine. Appellees' counsel also was not required to create a privilege log.
Judges: Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.