Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that research was funded when payment was based on an invoice submission without prior approval of the product
• finding the district court did not err in limiting its Section 101 analysis to a single representative claim where all claims were “substantially similar and linked to the same abstract idea”
• “The regulations allocate the research tax credit to the entity or person that bears ‘the financial risk of failure of the research to produce the desired product or result.’” (quoting Fairchild Indus., 71 F.3d at 870)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).