georgiacarry.org, Inc. v. Thomas C. Bordeaux, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employee can only be held liable for aiding and abetting NYSHRL violations where the employee “actually participates” in the alleged unlawful conduct
• dismissing complaint alleging violations of FHA that lacked “even minimal support for the proposition that the [defendants] were motivated by discriminatory intent”
• affirming Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of FHA complaint where the complaint “lacks even minimal support for the proposition that the . . . Defendants were motivated by discriminatory intent” (quotations omitted)
• declining to find that a landlord had engaged in intentional discrimination where “[o]nly untethered speculation support[ed] an inference of animus [based on a protected class] on the part of the . . . Defendants.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).