GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. v. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “[f]ailure to show any of the four factors is fatal, and the most common failure is not showing a substantial likelihood of success on the merits”
• noting that if the plaintiffs “have not shown a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, we need not consider the remaining factors in the preliminary injunction test”
• noting that this Court “upheld against Second Amendment challenge the federal prohibition on the possession of firearms by persons convicted of the misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9)”
• declining to reach the merits of a Second Amendment claim in a preliminary injunction appeal because, among other things, the record was not fully developed and the parties had not briefed an important historical issue
• “This slim preliminary injunction record does not provide nearly enough information to enable a court to fairly engage in a thorough constitutional analysis.”
• “Because the plaintiffs have not shown a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, we need not consider the remaining factors in the preliminary injunction test.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).