Supreme Court· 5/7/1973
Georgia v. United States
Citations
- 411 U.S. 526
- 93 S. Ct. 1702
- 36 L. Ed. 2d 472
- 1973 U.S. LEXIS 73
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “After extensive deliberations in 1970 on bills to extend the Voting Rights Act, during which the Allen case was repeatedly discussed, the Act was extended for five years, without any substantive modification of §5”
- “Section 5 is not concerned with a simple inventory of procedures, but rather with the reality of changed practices as they affect [minority] voters.”
- changes in electoral boundaries and creation of multi-member districts subject to preclearance
- future enforcement of reapportionment plan would be enjoined unless and until precleared
- future enforcement of reapportionment plan would be enjoined unless and until precleared
- changes in electoral boundaries and creation of multi-member districts subject to preclearance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart, Douglas, Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Burger, White, Powell, Rehnquist
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
137 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court· 1976-02-27· cited 4,982×
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 3,187×
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 652×
- City of Rome v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 419×
- United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court· 1977-03-01· cited 364×
- Shelby County v. HolderSupreme Court· 2013-06-25· cited 335×
- Beer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-03-30· cited 324×
- Holder v. HallSupreme Court· 1994-06-30· cited 296×
- Branch v. SmithSupreme Court· 2003-03-31· cited 257×
- Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. HolderSupreme Court· 2009-06-22· cited 241×
- United States v. Sheffield Bd. of Comm'rsSupreme Court· 1978-03-06· cited 222×
- Reno v. Bossier Parish School BoardSupreme Court· 1997-05-12· cited 215×
- Morris v. GressetteSupreme Court· 1977-06-20· cited 210×
- McDaniel v. SanchezSupreme Court· 1981-06-01· cited 190×
- City of Richmond v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1975-06-24· cited 183×
- Nipper v. SmithEleventh Circuit· 1994-12-02· cited 171×
- Presley v. Etowah County CommissionSupreme Court· 1992-01-27· cited 150×
- Morse v. Republican Party of VirginiaSupreme Court· 1996-03-27· cited 141×
- Georgia v. Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralSupreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 134×
- United States v. Joseph E. SmithD.C. Circuit· 1975-10-23· cited 117×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court· 1964-10-12· cited 3,703×
- South Carolina v. KatzenbachSupreme Court· 1966-05-02· cited 945×
- Allen v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court· 1968-10-14· cited 887×
- Whitcomb v. ChavisSupreme Court· 1971-06-07· cited 658×
- Perkins v. MatthewsSupreme Court· 1971-01-14· cited 304×
- Connor v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1971-06-14· cited 191×
- United States v. MoreheadSupreme Court· 1917-04-30· cited 65×
- United States v. State of GeorgiaN.D. Georgia· 1972-10-16· cited 4×
Other cases named Georgia v. United States
8 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Georgia v. United StatesE.D. Virginia· 1939-08-08· cited 3×
- Georgia v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-04-14· cited 2×
- Georgia v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-04-14· cited 1×
- Georgia v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-10-08· cited 1×
- Georgia v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-04-21· cited 1×
- Georgia v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-10-16· cited 1×
- Georgia v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-10-08
- Georgia v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-05-05
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.