Skip to main content
· 9/30/2004

Georgia State Board of Pardons & Paroles v. Finch

Citations

  • 605 S.E.2d 414
  • 269 Ga. App. 791
  • 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 3222
  • 2004 Ga. App. LEXIS 1296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that decisions which “necessarily require consideration of numerous factors and the exercise of deliberation and judgment [are] precisely the types of administrative action the discretionary function exception seeks to shield from judicial second-guessing.”
  • “Employment decisions … necessarily require consideration of numerous factors and the exercise of deliberation and judgment. They are therefore precisely the types of administrative action the discretionary function exception seeks to shield from judicial second-guessing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Johnson, Phipps

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.