Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Robinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the Commission's rejection of one expert opinion in favor of another
• requiring particular appellate deference to factual findings influenced by agency expertise
• “The probative weight to be accorded [medical] evidence is for the Commission to decide.” (alteration in original) (quoting C.D.S. Constr. Servs. v. Petrock, 218 Va. 1064, 1071 (1978))
• “‘[T]he commission’s findings are binding even if the weight of the evidence is contrary to those findings.’” (quoting Kane Plumbing v. Small, 7 Va. App. 132, 136, 371 S.E.2d 828, 831 (1988))
• requiring deference to agency expertise on factual findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).