Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, LP v. International Paper Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that contractual language “when isolated from the rest of the agreement . . . suggest[ed] a very broad assumption of liabilities” but not when considered next to the agreement’s other provisions
• “If a contract is unambiguous on its face, its proper construction is a question of law.”
• “If a contract is unambiguous on its face, its proper construction is a question of law.”
• “If a contract is unambiguous on its face, its proper construction is a question of law.”
• “If a contract is unambiguous on its face, its proper construction is a question of law.”
• “If a contract is unambiguous on its face, its proper construction is a question of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).